Notes:
|
Value Added Tax - MTIC transactions involving 19 deals - Sole issue whether Appellant knew or ought to have known of the connection to fraudulent VAT losses - Special significance of “diary” entries, implicitly made by the person who had masterminded 6 of the 19 deals, the diary having been seized by HMRC in the course of a separate criminal investigation - Significance of links between the Appellant and its main supplier – Appeal dismissed |